Robinson v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Robinson

240 A.D.2d 719, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7095

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 719 (Robinson v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Robinson, 240 A.D.2d 719, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7095 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action pursuant to CPLR article 54 to enforce a foreign judgment of the State of Washington, the judgment debtor appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), dated January 10, 1996, as, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination which denied her motion to vacate the judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The judgment debtor failed to establish that the foreign judgment by a sister State was procured by fraud or by default in appearance or that the foreign court lacked jurisdiction. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly determined that the foreign judgment was entitled to full faith and credit (see, [720]*720CPLR 5401) and properly denied the judgment debtor’s motion to vacate it. Thompson, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action pursuant to CPLR article 54 to enforce a foreign judgment of the State of Washington, the judgment debtor appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), dated January 10, 1996, as, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination which denied her motion to vacate the judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The judgment debtor failed to establish that the foreign judgment by a sister State was procured by fraud or by default in appearance or that the foreign court lacked jurisdiction. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly determined that the foreign judgment was entitled to full faith and credit (see, [720]*720CPLR 5401) and properly denied the judgment debtor’s motion to vacate it. Thompson, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D.2d 719, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-robinson-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack