Robinson v. Robinson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Robinson v. Robinson

176 A. 187, 118 N.J. Eq. 68, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 614

DecidedJanuary 10, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 176 A. 187 (Robinson v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Robinson, 176 A. 187, 118 N.J. Eq. 68, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 614 (N.J. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The advisory master found that the appellant had been guilty of adultery, and in that conclusion, after examination of the evidence, we concur. He also considered the defense of condonation, and held that it was not supported by the evidence, and in that conclusion also we concur.

The decree under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The advisory master found that the appellant had been guilty of adultery, and in that conclusion, after examination of the evidence, we concur. He also considered the defense of condonation, and held that it was not supported by the evidence, and in that conclusion also we concur.

The decree under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 A. 187, 118 N.J. Eq. 68, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-robinson-nj-1935.