Robinson v. Robinson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Robinson v. Robinson

176 A. 187, 118 N.J. Eq. 68, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 614

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 10, 1935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The advisory master found that the appellant had been guilty of adultery, and in that conclusion, after examination of the evidence, we concur. He also considered the defense of condonation, and held that it was not supported by the evidence, and in that conclusion also we concur.

The decree under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The advisory master found that the appellant had been guilty of adultery, and in that conclusion, after examination of the evidence, we concur. He also considered the defense of condonation, and held that it was not supported by the evidence, and in that conclusion also we concur.

The decree under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -None.

Robinson v. Robinson, 176 A. 187, 118 N.J. Eq. 68, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 614 (N.J. 1935).

Pincite

176 A. 187 (Robinson v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.