Robinson v. Robinson
This text of 597 So. 2d 415 (Robinson v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Nathan B. ROBINSON, Appellant,
v.
Luz Angela ROBINSON, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Bruce N. Crown, Miami, for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's petition for modification of child support. The trial court concluded that the change of circumstances was voluntary, and the evidence supports that conclusion. Appellant did not take job opportunities available to him and has engaged only in a limited job search in the construction industry, from which he may be disabled by medical problems. He has chosen not to seek employment in other lines of work in which he also has skills. Instead, as the trial court noted, he has voluntarily chosen to embark on self-employment. He has not satisfied the heavy burden of proof required to sustain a modification. Conklin v. Conklin, 551 So.2d 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
597 So. 2d 415, 1992 WL 79724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-robinson-fladistctapp-1992.