Robinson v. Robinson

332 So. 2d 154, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14418
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 340 So. 2d 935
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 1976·No. No. 75-927·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lee v. Lee, Fla.App.1975, 309 So.2d 26; Fesak v. Fesak, Fla.App.1974, 303 So.2d 47; Bateman v. Bateman, Fla.App.1974, 301 So.2d 472; Vandervoort v. Vandervoort, Fla.App.1974, 300 So.2d 694, and Cardillo v. Cardillo, Fla.App.1972, 269 So.2d 773.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Robinson, 332 So. 2d 154, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14418 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

332 So. 2d 154 (Robinson v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fesak v. Fesak
303 So. 2d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Bateman v. Bateman
301 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Vandervoort v. Vandervoort
300 So. 2d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Lee v. Lee
309 So. 2d 26 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Cardillo v. Cardillo
269 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)