Robinson v. Riccio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Riccio

194 A.D.2d 424, 599 N.Y.S.2d 957

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 A.D.2d 424 (Robinson v. Riccio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Riccio, 194 A.D.2d 424, 599 N.Y.S.2d 957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order [425]*425and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Edith Miller, J.), entered on or about July 14, 1992, which granted the petition to the extent of vacating petitioner’s termination as a probationary investigator for the Department of Transportation and ordering his reinstatement with back pay and accrued seniority benefits, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the matter remanded for trial on the issue of respondent’s good faith, without costs.

Triable issues of fact are presented, which cannot be resolved on the present record, as to respondent’s good faith in terminating petitioner’s probationary employment. Accordingly, a prompt trial on the issue is warranted (CPLR 7804 [h]). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Kupferman, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order [425]*425and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Edith Miller, J.), entered on or about July 14, 1992, which granted the petition to the extent of vacating petitioner’s termination as a probationary investigator for the Department of Transportation and ordering his reinstatement with back pay and accrued seniority benefits, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the matter remanded for trial on the issue of respondent’s good faith, without costs.

Triable issues of fact are presented, which cannot be resolved on the present record, as to respondent’s good faith in terminating petitioner’s probationary employment. Accordingly, a prompt trial on the issue is warranted (CPLR 7804 [h]). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Kupferman, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D.2d 424, 599 N.Y.S.2d 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-riccio-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack