Robinson v. Owens
This text of 293 F. App'x 232 (Robinson v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Zikiteran D. Robinson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Robinson v. Owens, No. 4:07-cv-03118-HMH, 2008 WL 788782 (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2008). Additionally, we deny Robinson’s motion for production of discovery materials. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
While Robinson sufficiently objected to the magistrate judge's findings regarding whether he was in the primary custody of the federal government at the time of his arrest, he failed to specifically object to the remainder of the magistrate judge’s recommendations, thereby waiving appellate review of those claims. See United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 3032, 168 L.Ed.2d 749 (2007).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 F. App'x 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-owens-ca4-2008.