Robinson v. Option One Mortgage Corp.

577 F. App'x 630
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 3, 2014·No. Nos. 13-3735, 14-1312·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, George Robinson challenges the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment, and denial of post-judgment relief, in this action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures and Fair Debt Collection Practices Acts. Upon careful de novo review, see Rochling v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 725 F.3d 927, 937 (8th Cir.2013) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper, because the claims are time-barred, see 12 U.S.C. § 2614; 15 U.S.C. § 1692(k); and we also conclude [631] that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration, see Noah v. Bond Cold Storage, 408 F.3d 1043, 1045 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Option One Mortgage Corp., 577 F. App'x 630 (8th Cir. 2014).

577 F. App'x 630 (Robinson v. Option One Mortgage Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kevin L. Noah v. Bond Cold Storage
408 F.3d 1043 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
Rochling v. Department of Veterans Affairs
725 F.3d 927 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)