Robinson v. North Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Robinson v. North Carolina

183 F. App'x 376

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2006·No. No. 06-6555·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Brent A. Robinson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Robinson v. North Carolina, No. 3:06-cv-000132, 2006 WL 753165 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Brent A. Robinson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Robinson v. North Carolina, No. 3:06-cv-000132, 2006 WL 753165 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Robinson v. North Carolina, 183 F. App'x 376 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

183 F. App'x 376 (Robinson v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related