Robinson v. Nielsen TV Ratings

Fourth Circuit

Robinson v. Nielsen TV Ratings

514 F. App'x 348

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2013·No. No. 12-1849·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sandra Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to file a belated appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Nielsen TV Ratings, No. 3:10-cv-00009-JRS (E.D.Va. June 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sandra Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to file a belated appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Nielsen TV Ratings, No. 3:10-cv-00009-JRS (E.D.Va. June 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Robinson v. Nielsen TV Ratings, 514 F. App'x 348 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

514 F. App'x 348 (Robinson v. Nielsen TV Ratings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.