Robinson v. Morgan

Opinion

USDC SDNY □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED | eee we ee ee eee ee ee ewww ew ee ee ee ee ee ee eH HX DOC # <= □□ □□□□□□□ LORENZO ROBINSON. i nu f- 9 ‘ □□ Plaintiff, -against- 22-cv-3711 (LAK)

WARREN MORGAN, et ano., Defendants. eee ee eee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ere ee HH X

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The complaint fails adequately to allege the existence of subjeg# matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v, Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990). O The citizenship of one or more limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs, [.,P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). Oo The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. =] The timely removal of the action from state court. Absent the filing, on or before May 16, 2022, of an amended complaint adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, the action will be dismissed. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2022 hn. Nh. ’ + nn ee Lewis A. Kaplan United State: District Judge