Robinson v. Morgan
This text of 58 N.H. 412 (Robinson v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The recognizance of this plaintiff, in the landlord and tenant proceeding, did not affect the rights of the parties established by the foreclosure of the defendant’s mortgage. The acknowledgment of an obligation to pay rent in case a tenancy shall be found to exist, cannot be regarded as an admission that a tenancy exists. Whatever might ordinarily be the effect of such recognizance in a case where the existence of the tenancy is a disputed question, it cannot have the effect which the plaintiff claims, in a case where it is admitted that the relation of landlord and tenant does not in fact exist, and where the defendant’s possession, under judgment of foreclosure, precludes the possibility of the trespasses alleged.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 N.H. 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-morgan-nh-1878.