Robinson v. Monadnock Paper Mill

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Robinson v. Monadnock Paper Mill

71 A. 864, 75 N.H. 589, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 70

DecidedJanuary 5, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A. 864 (Robinson v. Monadnock Paper Mill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Monadnock Paper Mill, 71 A. 864, 75 N.H. 589, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 70 (N.H. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Peaslbb, J.

There was no evidence from which the inference that the suit was a champertous one could properly be drawn. The presumption that the error of counsel was corrected by the court (Mitchell v. Railroad, 68 N. H. 96, 117) cannot be applied here, for it not only appears in the case that the error was not corrected, but it is stated in terms that the verdict is to be set aside unless the argument was justifiable.

Exception sustained: verdict set aside.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peaslbb, J.

There was no evidence from which the inference that the suit was a champertous one could properly be drawn. The presumption that the error of counsel was corrected by the court (Mitchell v. Railroad, 68 N. H. 96, 117) cannot be applied here, for it not only appears in the case that the error was not corrected, but it is stated in terms that the verdict is to be set aside unless the argument was justifiable.

Exception sustained: verdict set aside.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A. 864, 75 N.H. 589, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-monadnock-paper-mill-nh-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack