Robinson v. Mitchell Quinn

Superior Court of Delaware

Robinson v. Mitchell Quinn

1 Del. 365

DecidedJuly 5, 1834

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. 365 (Robinson v. Mitchell Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Mitchell Quinn, 1 Del. 365 (Del. Ct. App. 1834).

Pincite

Opinion

The pleas were—first, non assumpsit; second, payment; third, “that the amount of said note was attached in the deft.’s hands by virtue of a writ of fi. fa. attachment at the suit of the Farmers’ Bank against the said Edward Marshall, the indorser, before the said note was indorsed to plff.; and that they had paid over the amount to the said Farmers’ Bank according to the judgment of the court, on said attachment, against them as the garnishees of the said Edward Marshall.”

To this third plea there was a general demurrer and joinder.

Judgment for defts-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The pleas were—first, non assumpsit; second, payment; third, “that the amount of said note was attached in the deft.’s hands by virtue of a writ of fi. fa. attachment at the suit of the Farmers’ Bank against the said Edward Marshall, the indorser, before the said note was indorsed to plff.; and that they had paid over the amount to the said Farmers’ Bank according to the judgment of the court, on said attachment, against them as the garnishees of the said Edward Marshall.”

To this third plea there was a general demurrer and joinder.

Judgment for defts-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Del. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-mitchell-quinn-delsuperct-1834.