Robinson v. Meigs
This text of 10 Paige Ch. 41 (Robinson v. Meigs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
said the order for a resale of the premises was irregular ; that a defendant who had appeared in the suit, and who had an interest in the property or in the proceeds thereof, was entitled to notice of an application either to discharge a purchaser at a master’s sale, or for a resale of the property where the purchaser had neglected to comply with the terms of sale and to complete his purchase.
Order setting aside the sale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Paige Ch. 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-meigs-nychanct-1843.