Robinson v. Meigs

10 Paige Ch. 41

Opinion

The Chancellor

said the order for a resale of the premises was irregular ; that a defendant who had appeared in the suit, and who had an interest in the property or in the proceeds thereof, was entitled to notice of an application either to discharge a purchaser at a master’s sale, or for a resale of the property where the purchaser had neglected to comply with the terms of sale and to complete his purchase.

Order setting aside the sale.