Robinson v. McClellan
1 How. Pr. 90
This text of 1 How. Pr. 90 (Robinson v. McClellan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Robinson v. McClellan, 1 How. Pr. 90 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
Held that substitution of defendants’ attorney should have been duly entered, and notice thereof served on plaintiff’s attorney, before making motion.
Hecision.—Motion denied with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-mcclellan-nysupct-1845.