Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Robinson v. McCampbell

Robinson v. McCampbell

699 So. 2d 788, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10730, 1997 WL 586766
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 19, 1997
DocketNo. 97-3210
StatusPublished

This text of 699 So. 2d 788 (Robinson v. McCampbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. McCampbell, 699 So. 2d 788, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10730, 1997 WL 586766 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for habeas corpus and remand with direction to consider pretrial release in accordance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131.

The state has failed to respond to the critical point in the petition that the fingerprint evidence alone was insufficient for the trial court to conclude that the “proof is evident or the presumption great” that petitioner is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offenses charged. State v. Arthur, 390 So.2d 717, 718 (Fla.1980); Elderbroom v. Knowles, 621 So.2d 518, 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); see also Jaramillo v. State, 417 So.2d 257 (Fla.1982); Mutcherson v. State, 696 So.2d 420 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elderbroom v. Knowles
621 So. 2d 518 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Mutcherson v. State
696 So. 2d 420 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Jaramillo v. State
417 So. 2d 257 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
State v. Arthur
390 So. 2d 717 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 So. 2d 788, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10730, 1997 WL 586766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-mccampbell-fladistctapp-1997.