Robinson v. McCampbell

699 So. 2d 788, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10730, 1997 WL 586766
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 1997·No. No. 97-3210·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for habeas corpus and remand with direction to consider pretrial release in accordance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131.

The state has failed to respond to the critical point in the petition that the fingerprint evidence alone was insufficient for the trial court to conclude that the “proof is evident or the presumption great” that petitioner is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offenses charged. State v. Arthur, 390 So.2d 717, 718 (Fla.1980); Elderbroom v. Knowles, 621 So.2d 518, 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); see also Jaramillo v. State, 417 So.2d 257 (Fla.1982); Mutcherson v. State, 696 So.2d 420 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. McCampbell, 699 So. 2d 788, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10730, 1997 WL 586766 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

699 So. 2d 788 (Robinson v. McCampbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elderbroom v. Knowles
621 So. 2d 518 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Mutcherson v. State
696 So. 2d 420 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Jaramillo v. State
417 So. 2d 257 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
State v. Arthur
390 So. 2d 717 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)