Robinson v. Marshall

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

YASHICA ROBINSON, M.D., ) et al., on behalf of ) themselves, their ) patients, physicians, ) clinic administrators, ) and staff, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v. ) 2:19cv365-MHT ) (WO) STEVEN MARSHALL, in his ) official capacity as ) Alabama Attorney General, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

In light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, ___ S. Ct. ___, 2022 WL 2276808 (June 24, 2022), overruling Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), and based on the representations made on the record today by counsel for the plaintiffs that, as a result of the Court’s decision in Jackson Women’s October 29, 2019, preliminary injunction (Doc. 69), Robinson v. Marshall, 415 F. Supp. 3d 1053 (M.D. Ala.

2019), no longer exists, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The defendants’ emergency motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction (Doc. 190), which is unopposed, is granted; and

(2) The October 29, 2019, preliminary injunction (Doc. 69) is dissolved. DONE, this the 24th day of June, 2022.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE