Robinson v. Magnotti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Magnotti

271 A.D.2d 1022

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 1022 (Robinson v. Magnotti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Magnotti, 271 A.D.2d 1022 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries as a consequence of plaintiff’s being struck by an automobile, operated by one defendant and owned by the other defendant, while crossing a public thoroughfare. Judgment granting defendants’ motions and setting aside the verdict in favor of the plaintiff and dismissing the complaint reversed on the law, with costs, the motions denied, the verdict for the plaintiff reinstated, and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. Plaintiff’s proof established a prima facie case on the issues of defendants’ negligence and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence. The jury’s verdict for the plaintiff had ample support in the evidence. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for personal injuries as a consequence of plaintiff’s being struck by an automobile, operated by one defendant and owned by the other defendant, while crossing a public thoroughfare. Judgment granting defendants’ motions and setting aside the verdict in favor of the plaintiff and dismissing the complaint reversed on the law, with costs, the motions denied, the verdict for the plaintiff reinstated, and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. Plaintiff’s proof established a prima facie case on the issues of defendants’ negligence and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence. The jury’s verdict for the plaintiff had ample support in the evidence. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-magnotti-nyappdiv-1947.