Robinson v. Mackston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Mackston

161 A.D.2d 643, 558 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6009

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 161 A.D.2d 643 (Robinson v. Mackston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Mackston, 161 A.D.2d 643, 558 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent, a Justice of the County Court, Nassau County, from conducting a hearing to determine the reasonableness of counsel fees paid to the petitioner by a client, Harold Goerlich, in connection with an application by the petitioner for leave to withdraw as attorney of record for Harold Goerlich in a criminal prosecution.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, and the temporary stay of "any hearing regarding the reasonableness of attorney’s fees” granted by Justice Harwood in an order to show cause dated April 6, 1990, is vacated.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged —acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; accord, Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 353). The County Court clearly has jurisdiction to decide a motion by counsel to withdraw and to direct a hearing to aid in the disposition of that motion. Mangano, P. J., Brown, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent, a Justice of the County Court, Nassau County, from conducting a hearing to determine the reasonableness of counsel fees paid to the petitioner by a client, Harold Goerlich, in connection with an application by the petitioner for leave to withdraw as attorney of record for Harold Goerlich in a criminal prosecution.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, and the temporary stay of "any hearing regarding the reasonableness of attorney’s fees” granted by Justice Harwood in an order to show cause dated April 6, 1990, is vacated.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged —acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; accord, Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 353). The County Court clearly has jurisdiction to decide a motion by counsel to withdraw and to direct a hearing to aid in the disposition of that motion. Mangano, P. J., Brown, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 A.D.2d 643, 558 N.Y.S.2d 836, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-mackston-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack