Robinson v. Lynn

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wane KX JAMES ROBINSON, Plaintiff, -against- 18 CIVIL 2409 (PMH) JUDGMENT JANICE LYNN WOLF-FRIEDMAN, et al., Defendants. wane eee KX It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated February 5, 2021, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss. While “[d]istrict courts should frequently provide leave to amend before dismissing a pro se complaint . . . leave to amend is not necessary when it would be futile.” Reed v. Friedman Met. Corp., 541 F. App’x 40, 41 (2d Cir. 2013) (citing Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000)). Here, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice as any amendment would be futile and Plaintiff has already had an opportunity to amend his pleading; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 8, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Count) BY: Dept Clerk