Robinson v. Lawrence

99 A.D.3d 980, 952 N.Y.2d 468
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 24, 2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants failed to adequately address the plaintiffs claim, set forth in her bill of particulars, that as a result of the subject accident, she sustained certain injuries to her right knee (see Rahman v Sarpaz, 62 AD3d 979, 980 [2009]; Joseph v Hampton, 48 AD3d 638, 638-639 [2008]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, regardless of the sufficiency of the plaintiffs opposition papers (see Rahman v Sarpaz, 62 AD3d at 980; Joseph v Hampton, 48 AD3d at 639). Angiolillo, J.E, Balkin, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Lawrence, 99 A.D.3d 980, 952 N.Y.2d 468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

99 A.D.3d 980 (Robinson v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cervantes v. McDermott
2017 NY Slip Op 5804 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)