Robinson v. Klein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Robinson v. Klein

350 So. 2d 124, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16461

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 1977·No. No. 77-752·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of several recent decisions of this court, the petitioners make a strong argument for the proposition that an affirmative defense was erroneously stricken from their answer. However, they cannot obtain relief by way of certiorari because there remains available to them a full, adequate and complete remedy through appeal after final judgment. Employers Fire Insurance Company v. Blanchard, 234 So.2d 381 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970); Marlowe v. Ferreira, 211 So.2d 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).

Certiorari denied.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In view of several recent decisions of this court, the petitioners make a strong argument for the proposition that an affirmative defense was erroneously stricken from their answer. However, they cannot obtain relief by way of certiorari because there remains available to them a full, adequate and complete remedy through appeal after final judgment. Employers Fire Insurance Company v. Blanchard, 234 So.2d 381 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970); Marlowe v. Ferreira, 211 So.2d 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).

Certiorari denied.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.

Robinson v. Klein, 350 So. 2d 124, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16461 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

350 So. 2d 124 (Robinson v. Klein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related