Robinson v. King

District Court, S.D. Mississippi·Decided September 19, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-00438·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOSHUA VALENTINO ROBINSON, PLAINTIFF # 425686

v. CIVIL NO. 1:19cv438-HSO-JCG

WENDY KING DEFENDANT

ORDER SEVERING HABEAS CLAIM

This matter is before the Court for consideration of pro se Plaintiff Joshua Valentino Robinson’s pleadings. Robinson is incarcerated a pretrial detainee at the Harrison County Adult Detention Center, and he challenges his state criminal proceedings in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case. Robinson seeks damages and asks that his pending criminal charges be “terminated.” Compl. [1] at 4. The Court has considered and liberally construed the pleadings. To the extent Robinson seeks release, he must pursue such relief through a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Orellana v. Kyle, 65 F.3d 29, 31 (5th Cir. 1995). To the extent Robinson seeks damages, the case may be cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Id. “If such a § 1983 complaint contains both habeas and § 1983 claims, the district court should separate the claims and decide the § 1983 claims.” Id. Therefore, Robinson’s habeas claim seeking release will be severed from this case. Rather than require Robinson to re-file the habeas claims, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to open a new case and file a copy of the Complaint [1], Motion [2] for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and this Order in the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas proceeding. Robinson’s § 1983 claim for damages will proceed in this civil action. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pro se Plaintiff Joshua Valentino Robinson’s habeas claim seeking release is SEVERED from this

case. The Clerk of Court shall open a new 28 U.S.C. ' 2241 civil action on Plaintiff’s habeas claim, and therein file a copy of the Complaint [1], Motion [2] for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of this Order. The 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for damages shall proceed in this civil action. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 19th day of September, 2019.

s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. King, (S.D. Miss. 2019).

Robinson v. King (Robinson v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orellana v. Kyle
65 F.3d 29 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)