Home/California Supreme Court/Robinson v. Kellum

Robinson v. Kellum

6 Cal. 399
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 399 (Robinson v. Kellum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Kellum, 6 Cal. 399 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

[400]*400An action on the case will not lie for improperly suing out an injunction, unless it is charged in the declaration as an abuse of the process of the Court through malice, and without probable cause. If the act complained of is destitute of these ingredients, then the only remedy of the injured party is an action upon the injunction bond, which is specially provided by the statute as a protection against injury, even without malice.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DG BF, LLC v. Michael Ray
Court of Chancery of Delaware, 2022
Gaume v. N.M. Interstate Stream Comm'n
2019 NMCA 064 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2019)
Wallace v. Miller
140 Cal. App. 3d 636 (California Court of Appeal, 1983)
Dickey v. Rosso
23 Cal. App. 3d 493 (California Court of Appeal, 1972)
Shepherd v. Constructora, S.A
220 F.2d 1 (Ninth Circuit, 1955)
Junction Irrigation Co. v. Snow
118 P.2d 130 (Utah Supreme Court, 1941)
McPheeters v. Bateman
53 P.2d 195 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Jones v. Richardson
50 P.2d 810 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Blumenthal v. Maryland Casualty Co.
6 P.2d 965 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Vesper v. Crane Co.
130 P. 876 (California Supreme Court, 1913)
Young Chun v. Robinson
21 Haw. 368 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1912)
Pyott Land & Mining Co. v. Tarwater
126 Tenn. 601 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1912)
Powell v. Woodbury
83 A. 541 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1912)
Doyle v. City of Sandpoint
112 P. 204 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1910)
Hess v. German Baking Co.
60 P. 1011 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1900)
Mitchell v. Silver Lake Lodge
45 P. 798 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1896)
Harless v. Consumers' Gas Trust Co.
43 N.E. 456 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1896)
Asevado v. Orr
34 P. 777 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Campbell v. Carroll
35 Mo. App. 640 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)
Ruble v. Coyote G. & S. M. Co.
10 Or. 39 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-kellum-cal-1856.