Robinson v. Johnson
This text of Robinson v. Johnson (Robinson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION
AARON JEWANN ROBINSON, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:19-cv-53 v. JAVAKA JOHNSON; and CO HUGGINS, Defendants.
ORDER On March 16, 2021, Defendants filed their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, arguing Plaintiff cannot recover compensatory or punitive damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) (the Prison Litigation Reform Act or “PLRA”). However, on April 9, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Hoever v. Marks, 993 F.3d 1351 (11th Cir. 2021), overturning previous Circuit precedent and holding the PLRA permits claims for punitive damages without a showing of physical injury. In light of the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling in Hoever, Defendants are ORDERED to submit supplemental briefing on whether they still argue they are entitled to summary judgment on any claims Plaintiff has for compensatory or punitive damages. Defendants’ briefing must be submitted with 14 days of this Order. SO ORDERED, this 7th day of May, 2021.
Bo BENJAMIN W.CHEESBRO. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robinson v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-johnson-gasd-2021.