Robinson v. Johnson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 96-20133 Summary Calendar __________________
CHARLES EDWARD ROBINSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent,
PETER ADAMS and INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-3784 - - - - - - - - - - July 31, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Charles Edward Robinson, TDCJ inmate #678517, appeals the
district court's final judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b), of Robinson's motion for damages, filed under the district
court docket number assigned to Robinson's petition for federal
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-20133 -2-
habeas relief. Robinson's request for a certificate of probable
cause is denied as unnecessary.
Robinson argues that the district court erred by failing to
hold in abeyance, until the determination of his habeas petition,
his purported civil rights suit against Adams. We have carefully
reviewed the record and the appellate arguments. For essentially
the same reasons as explained in the order of dismissal, see
Robinson v. Adams, No. H-95-3784 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 16, 1996), we
find no error by the court's dismissal for want of federal
jurisdiction.
This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous.
See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. Johnson (Robinson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.