Robinson v. Jewish Hospital and Medical Center of Brooklyn

221 A.D.2d 328, 633 N.Y.S.2d 1010

This text of 221 A.D.2d 328 (Robinson v. Jewish Hospital and Medical Center of Brooklyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Jewish Hospital and Medical Center of Brooklyn, 221 A.D.2d 328, 633 N.Y.S.2d 1010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Motion by the first and second third-party plaintiffs-respondents to strike points II and III of the second third-party defendant-appellant’s reply brief on the ground that those points improperly raise a new substantive issue.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied.

The reply brief did not improperly raise a new substantive issue (cf, People v Minota, 137 AD2d 837; State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v LiMauro, 103 AD2d 514, 521-522, affd 65 NY2d 369). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur. [See, 136 Mise 2d 880.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauro
482 N.E.2d 13 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauro
103 A.D.2d 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Minota
137 A.D.2d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 A.D.2d 328, 633 N.Y.S.2d 1010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-jewish-hospital-and-medical-center-of-brooklyn-nyappdiv-1995.