Robinson v. Interbond Corp. of America
719 So. 2d 380, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13569, 1998 WL 765018
Opinion
The order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission disqualifying the appellant from receiving benefits is reversed. The isolated event the appellant is charged with, does not constitute that type of willful or substantial disregard of the employer’s interests which rises to the level of misconduct as defined in Section 443.036(26), Florida Statutes (1997). See Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc., 637 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Grossman v. [381] J.C. Penney Co.2071, 689 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. Interbond Corp. of America, 719 So. 2d 380, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13569, 1998 WL 765018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
719 So. 2d 380 (Robinson v. Interbond Corp. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc.
637 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Grossman v. JC PENNEY CO. 2071
689 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)