Robinson v. Interbond Corp. of America

719 So. 2d 380, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13569, 1998 WL 765018
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 21, 1998
DocketNo. 98-598
StatusPublished

This text of 719 So. 2d 380 (Robinson v. Interbond Corp. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Interbond Corp. of America, 719 So. 2d 380, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13569, 1998 WL 765018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission disqualifying the appellant from receiving benefits is reversed. The isolated event the appellant is charged with, does not constitute that type of willful or substantial disregard of the employer’s interests which rises to the level of misconduct as defined in Section 443.036(26), Florida Statutes (1997). See Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc., 637 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Grossman v. [381]*381J.C. Penney Co.2071, 689 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc.
637 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Grossman v. JC PENNEY CO. 2071
689 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 So. 2d 380, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13569, 1998 WL 765018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-interbond-corp-of-america-fladistctapp-1998.