Robinson v. Interbond Corp. of America
This text of 719 So. 2d 380 (Robinson v. Interbond Corp. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission disqualifying the appellant from receiving benefits is reversed. The isolated event the appellant is charged with, does not constitute that type of willful or substantial disregard of the employer’s interests which rises to the level of misconduct as defined in Section 443.036(26), Florida Statutes (1997). See Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc., 637 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Grossman v. [381]*381J.C. Penney Co.2071, 689 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
719 So. 2d 380, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13569, 1998 WL 765018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-interbond-corp-of-america-fladistctapp-1998.