Robinson v. Hunter
374 U.S. 488, 83 S. Ct. 1875, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1044, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 982
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 17, 1963
Docket5, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 374 U.S. 488 (Robinson v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Robinson v. Hunter, 374 U.S. 488, 83 S. Ct. 1875, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1044, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 982 (1963).
Opinion
ROBINSON ET AL.
v.
HUNTER ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
L. W. Holt, Henry Halvor Jones and Simon Lawrence Cain for appellants.
Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bruce Baines v. City of Damville, Virginia, the Rev. Lendell W. Chase v. Chief Eugene McCain (Two Cases). Hildreth G. McGhee v. City of Danville, Lewis v. Bennett, the Rev. Lendell W. Chase v. Honorable A. M. Aiken, Judge, (Two Cases). Dolores J. Page and Margaret P. Dillard v. Chief Eugene McCain
337 F.2d 579 (Fourth Circuit, 1964)
Baines v. City of Danville, Virginia
337 F.2d 579 (Fourth Circuit, 1964)
Chase v. McCain
220 F. Supp. 407 (W.D. Virginia, 1963)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
374 U.S. 488, 83 S. Ct. 1875, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1044, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-hunter-scotus-1963.