Robinson v. . Howard

84 N.C. 151
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 84 N.C. 151 (Robinson v. . Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. . Howard, 84 N.C. 151 (N.C. 1881).

Opinion

Ruffin, J.

If the plaintiff'seeks to- recover of the- parties whom, he styles,.“ school committee,” in their individual capacity, then his action will not lie; for-being public officers and- contracting with the plaintiff'as such, they are not-personally responsible; it being the law, that public officers are not liable on any contract they may make within the-line o-f their duty. If he seeks to recover of the “-school committee” in its,corporate capacity, then he-has-mistaken his remedy.

The school committee- is not allowed-, by law, to have any of the school fund under its control. I.t could, not, if it would, pay the plaintiff out of the proper fund... Its duty *153 consists in giving the teacher an order on. the county treasurer for the sum due for his services. And should the-plaintiff get a judgment against the “ committee,”1 he would: be no nearer his money than now. His appropriate and only remedy is by means of mandamus, (Taylor v. Schoo l Committee, 5 Jones, 98) of which a justice of the peace has no jurisdiction.

No error. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. . Kinney
31 S.E. 874 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 N.C. 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-howard-nc-1881.