Robinson v. Hinkle
This text of Robinson v. Hinkle (Robinson v. Hinkle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7298
MARVIN GAYE ROBINSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
G. M. HINKLE, Chief Warden; T. MILLS, C/O Security; HITCH, C/O Security; BANKS, Sergeant; B. HAIRSTON, C/O Security; ROBIN HULBERT, Director Mental Health; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director Department of Corrections,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00550-LO-TRJ)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marvin Gaye Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Marvin Gaye Robinson appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Robinson v. Hinkle, No. 1:10-cv-00550-LO-TRJ (E.D. Va.
filed July 27, 2010 & entered July 28, 2010). We deny
Robinson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robinson v. Hinkle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-hinkle-ca4-2011.