Robinson v. Haynes

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6616

KENNETH EARL ROBINSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GRADY J. HAYNES; LYNN HENRY; JANET POWELL,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:09-cr-03005-FL)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Earl Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Oliver Gray Wheeler, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Earl Robinson appeals the district court’s

order granting Defendant’s motion for injunctive relief in this

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Haynes, No.

5:09-ct-03005-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED