Robinson v. Haviland

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided October 28, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-05195·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

ANTHONY J. ROBINSON, CASE NO. 2:20-CV-5195 Petitioner, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

ORDER

On October 8, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts recommending that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 6.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. Petitioner has waived his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10/28/2020 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. 10/28/2020 Date EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Haviland, (S.D. Ohio 2020).

Robinson v. Haviland (Robinson v. Haviland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related