Robinson v. Hathaway
1 Brayt. 150
Opinion
There is no error, the evidence was properly excluded; the tenant could not set up a defence adverse [151] to the title of his landlord ; this defence was, not that plaintiff, the lessor, had parted with his interest to an assignee, but that he had no title from his grantor.
Judgment of the County Court affirmed. ’
See Ejectment 4. Pleas and Pleadings 6. Tresspass 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. Hathaway, 1 Brayt. 150 (Vt. 1819).
1 Brayt. 150 (Robinson v. Hathaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.