Robinson v. Hall
This text of 77 Mass. 483 (Robinson v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Taking all the papers together, it appears that the assignee assigned to the bankrupt this note as part of the deficiency in personal estate. It not appearing that its value exceeded three hundred dollars, it was competent for the assignee to do so. U. S. St. of 1841, sess. 1, c. 9, § 3, 5 U. S. Sts. at Large, 443. In re Grant, 2 Story R. 312. The note in the [485]*485schedule and the judgment produced are for the same debt. And the bankrupt, having acquired the beneficial interest by such assignment, may sue in his own name. Stone v. Hubbard, 7 Cush. 595. Judgment for the plaintiff
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Mass. 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-hall-mass-1858.