Robinson v. Hall

44 Mass. 301
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1841·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon these answers, the court are of opinion that the trustees must be discharged.

The debt due from Blackinton & Co. was paid, bona fide, and without knowledge of the service of the trustee process. Rev. Sts. c. 109, § 5. Williams v. Marston, 3 Pick. 65. Wood v. Bodwell, 12 Pick. 268.

As to the others, the contract was entire, and was not completed ; and no pro rata wages were earned. At the time of the service of the writ, therefore, there was no subsisting debt from the trustees to the principal defendant, either due, or to become due and payable afterwards.

Trustees discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. Hall, 44 Mass. 301 (Mass. 1841).

44 Mass. 301 (Robinson v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medley v. American Radiator Co.
66 S.W. 88 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1901)