Robinson v. Ficken

New York Court of Common Pleas

Robinson v. Ficken

10 Misc. 771

DecidedJuly 1, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Misc. 771 (Robinson v. Ficken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Ficken, 10 Misc. 771 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Guriam.

It appears that the plaintiff’s exhibits Eos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, and defendant’s exhibits Eos. 1 and 2, are omitted from the return, which omission precludes any determination as to the matters litigated at this time.

It is, therefore, directed that the appeal be reheard at the Additional General Term of this court, to be held December 20, 1894, the return to be amended in the particulars noted meanwhile. Krakowski v. North. N. Y., etc., Assn., 54 N. Y. St. Repr. 119.

Present: Bisohoff and Giegerich, JJ.

Beargument ordered; papers to be amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Guriam.

It appears that the plaintiff’s exhibits Eos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, and defendant’s exhibits Eos. 1 and 2, are omitted from the return, which omission precludes any determination as to the matters litigated at this time.

It is, therefore, directed that the appeal be reheard at the Additional General Term of this court, to be held December 20, 1894, the return to be amended in the particulars noted meanwhile. Krakowski v. North. N. Y., etc., Assn., 54 N. Y. St. Repr. 119.

Present: Bisohoff and Giegerich, JJ.

Beargument ordered; papers to be amended.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Misc. 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-ficken-nyctcompl-1894.