Robinson v. Ferens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Ferens

33 A.D.2d 688, 306 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2921

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 688 (Robinson v. Ferens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Ferens, 33 A.D.2d 688, 306 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expenses, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 14, 1969, in favor of defendant upon the verdict of a jury after a trial on the issues of liability only. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs, to abide the event. The’ findings of fact below have been affirmed. In our opinion, the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to have the summations recorded (cf. Devine v. Keller, 32 A D 2d 34, 36; Croix v. New York City Tr. Auth., 28 A D 2d 691; Sharp v. City of Hornell, 12 A D 2d 1002) and in refusing to charge section 60 of the New York City Traffic Regulations as requested (Taggart v. Vogel, 3 N Y 2d 58, 60). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expenses, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 14, 1969, in favor of defendant upon the verdict of a jury after a trial on the issues of liability only. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs, to abide the event. The’ findings of fact below have been affirmed. In our opinion, the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to have the summations recorded (cf. Devine v. Keller, 32 A D 2d 34, 36; Croix v. New York City Tr. Auth., 28 A D 2d 691; Sharp v. City of Hornell, 12 A D 2d 1002) and in refusing to charge section 60 of the New York City Traffic Regulations as requested (Taggart v. Vogel, 3 N Y 2d 58, 60). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 688, 306 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-ferens-nyappdiv-1969.