Robinson v. Estey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Robinson v. Estey

89 S.E. 1049, 18 Ga. App. 525, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1093

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 15, 1916

Docket7283

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E. 1049 (Robinson v. Estey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Estey, 89 S.E. 1049, 18 Ga. App. 525, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1093 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, O. J.

The judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari. The affidavit of illegality, which was dismissed on motion, attempted to go behind the judgment and set up a defense available before' its rendition, without any allegation to relieve the defendant from the operation of the general rule.

Judgment affirmed.

' Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. December 31, 1915.

O. G. Battle, Morris Blacks, 8. A. Massell, for plaintiff in error. A. L. Richards, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, O. J.

The judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari. The affidavit of illegality, which was dismissed on motion, attempted to go behind the judgment and set up a defense available before' its rendition, without any allegation to relieve the defendant from the operation of the general rule.

Judgment affirmed.

' Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. December 31, 1915.

O. G. Battle, Morris Blacks, 8. A. Massell, for plaintiff in error. A. L. Richards, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E. 1049, 18 Ga. App. 525, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-estey-gactapp-1916.