Robinson v. Espinosa

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Robinson v. Espinosa

502 So. 2d 527, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 545, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 17, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 502 So. 2d 527 (Robinson v. Espinosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. Espinosa, 502 So. 2d 527, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 545, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Espinosa, the owner of the apartment building where Robinson was injured by a tenant’s dog. The trial court’s basis for the summary judgment was that Espinosa, the landowner, was not liable for Robinson’s injuries because the dog belonged to a tenant. We reverse on the authority of Noble v. Yorke, 490 So.2d 29 (Fla.1986), and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Espinosa, the owner of the apartment building where Robinson was injured by a tenant’s dog. The trial court’s basis for the summary judgment was that Espinosa, the landowner, was not liable for Robinson’s injuries because the dog belonged to a tenant. We reverse on the authority of Noble v. Yorke, 490 So.2d 29 (Fla.1986), and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 So. 2d 527, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 545, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-espinosa-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack