Robinson v. Dumas

42 Ga. 614
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1871
StatusPublished

This text of 42 Ga. 614 (Robinson v. Dumas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Dumas, 42 Ga. 614 (Ga. 1871).

Opinion

McCay, J.

The judgment of this Court on the issue tendered by the defendant in this affidavit of illegality was as follows: The tribunal to which the question had been referred had decided that the evidence before him showed a part of the consideration of the debt to be slaves, but he further decided that, as the evidence did not show what part of it was slaves, he would x’efer it to a jury.

This Court, upon this point, at December Term, 1869, reversed the judgment of the Court below on two grounds:

1st. This Court held that the evidence did not show the consideration to be slaves, and that the Court ought to have ordered the judgment to proceed for the one-third not paid.

In our judgment that settled the dispute. It would be very unfair to keep open this part of the dispute and close up the claim of the plaintiff for the two-thirds he said was not paid. If there is to be a rehearing upon one point, it would be only fair to open the other. But the Judge only [616]*616obeyed the order of this Court in directing the execution to proceed for the one-third, as it was the clear judgment of this Court that he should so do. We therefore affirm his judgment in dismissing this illegality.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Ga. 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-dumas-ga-1871.