Robinson v. Director of Patuxent Institution
203 A.2d 907, 236 Md. 624, 1964 Md. LEXIS 938
Opinion
This application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency by Chief Judge Manley raises no question except the sufficiency and weight of the evidence. An allegation that the trial was in violation of rights guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments is too general to require an answer. We think the evidence in the medical reports was sufficient to support the trial court’s finding, and the trial court was not clearly in error.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 203 A.2d 907, 236 Md. 624, 1964 Md. LEXIS 938 (Md. 1964).
203 A.2d 907 (Robinson v. Director of Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johns v. Director of Patuxent Institution
211 A.2d 751 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)