Robinson v. . Dairy Farms, Ins.
This text of 193 S.E. 731 (Robinson v. . Dairy Farms, Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action for actionable negligence, brought by plaintiff against defendants. The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto were as follows:
"1. Was the plaintiff Dr. Frank H. Robinson injured in his person and property by the negligence of the defendants Biltmore Dairy Farms, Inc., and Charles Lane, as alleged in the complaint? Ans.: `No.'
"2. If so, did the plaintiff Dr. Frank H. Robinson, by his own negligence, contribute to his injury, as alleged in the answer? Ans.: ........
"3. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff Dr. Frank H. Robinson entitled to recover of the defendants Biltmore Dairy Farms, Inc., and Charles Lane for injury to his person? Ans.: ........."
"4. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff Dr. Frank H. Robinson entitled to recover of the defendants Biltmore Dairy Farms, Inc., and Charles Lane, for injury to his property? Ans.: ......."
On the verdict the court below rendered judgment for defendants. The plaintiff made certain exceptions and assignments of error and appealed to the Supreme Court. From the argument of counsel and on the entire record, we can find no prejudicial or reversible error. The jury has answered the issue in favor of defendants. The court below, in an able and clear charge (consisting of 36 pages), gave the law applicable to the facts. In the judgment of the court below we find
No error. *Page 835
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 S.E. 731, 212 N.C. 834, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-dairy-farms-ins-nc-1937.