Robinson v. Crump

35 Tex. 426
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 Tex. 426 (Robinson v. Crump) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Crump, 35 Tex. 426 (Tex. 1872).

Opinion

Walker, J.

A laborious examination of the record and briefs in this case has, we think, enabled us to decide the only necessary question in few words. Nancy Robinson was not the wife nor widow of Eson Tison, deceased, and she can claim no homestead right through him.

Nancy Seward and her children were the only per[427]*427sons, if any, who could claim a homestead right to the land in controversy. We are not disposed to put a premium upon lewdness and crime, by cutting out the rights of a lawful wife and legitimate children, to bestow gratuities upon an adulteress, and her illegitimate offspring. (See Styles v. Gray, 10 Texas, 503.)

If the plaintiffs had had proper standing in court, or been entitled to homestead rights, we should then find ourselves compelled to reverse the judgment for error in the charge of the court. But these appellants have suffered no injury thereby, and we therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.

Affirmed.

Presiding Judge Evans did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hassler & Kinkler v. Kay
1 White & W. 363 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Tex. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-crump-tex-1872.