Robinson v. Connell

87 A. 300, 240 Pa. 96, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 637
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 24, 1913
DocketAppeal, No. 401
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 A. 300 (Robinson v. Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Connell, 87 A. 300, 240 Pa. 96, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 637 (Pa. 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The majority of the court are of opinion that the contract upon which the appellant brought this action is one of indemnity, and the averments of the affidavit of defense are, therefore, sufficient to prévent judgment. The order discharging the rule for it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lackey v. Southern Railway Co.
13 S.E.2d 234 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A. 300, 240 Pa. 96, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-connell-pa-1913.