Robinson v. Connell
87 A. 300, 240 Pa. 96, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 637
Opinion
The majority of the court are of opinion that the contract upon which the appellant brought this action is one of indemnity, and the averments of the affidavit of defense are, therefore, sufficient to prévent judgment. The order discharging the rule for it is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. Connell, 87 A. 300, 240 Pa. 96, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 637 (Pa. 1913).
87 A. 300 (Robinson v. Connell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lackey v. Southern Railway Co.
13 S.E.2d 234 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)