Home/Massachusetts Appeals Court/Robinson v. Commissioner of Department of Youth Services

Robinson v. Commissioner of Department of Youth Services

384 N.E.2d 1253, 7 Mass. App. Ct. 847
CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court
DecidedJanuary 23, 1979
StatusPublished

This text of 384 N.E.2d 1253 (Robinson v. Commissioner of Department of Youth Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. Commissioner of Department of Youth Services, 384 N.E.2d 1253, 7 Mass. App. Ct. 847 (Mass. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

Since the appellant has not shown good cause for his failure to pay the docket fee within the time prescribed by Mass.R.A.P. 10(a), as amended, 367 Mass. 919 (1975), or the existence of a meritorious appeal, we affirm the order of the single justice denying the appellant’s motion to docket his appeal late. See Vyskocil v. Vyskocil, 376 Mass. 137, 139-140 (1978); Tisei v. Building Inspector of Marlborough, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 377, 379 (1975); Westinghouse Elec. Supply Co. v. Healy Corp., 5 Mass. App. Ct. 43, 57-62 (1977).

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tisei v. Building Inspector of Marlborough
330 N.E.2d 488 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1975)
Vyskocil v. Vyskocil
379 N.E.2d 1090 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1978)
Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Healy Corp.
359 N.E.2d 634 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
384 N.E.2d 1253, 7 Mass. App. Ct. 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-commissioner-of-department-of-youth-services-massappct-1979.