Robinson v. Collins

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. Collins

187 Misc. 359, 62 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2168

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 25, 1946·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum Respondent, being the owner of only a fractional interest in the premises, is not “ the landlord ” within the meaning of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of section 6 of the Rent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (8 Federal Register 13918, as amd.).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed dismissing the petition on the merits, with costs.

Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Memorandum Respondent, being the owner of only a fractional interest in the premises, is not “ the landlord ” within the meaning of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of section 6 of the Rent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (8 Federal Register 13918, as amd.).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed dismissing the petition on the merits, with costs.

Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Robinson v. Collins, 187 Misc. 359, 62 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2168 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

187 Misc. 359 (Robinson v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related