Robinson v. Clark

Fourth Circuit

Robinson v. Clark

543 F. App'x 339

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2013·No. No. 13-7019·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Corey Jawan Robinson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Clark, No. 5:12-cv-00502-JMC, 2013 WL 3110003 (D.S.C. June 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [340] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Corey Jawan Robinson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Clark, No. 5:12-cv-00502-JMC, 2013 WL 3110003 (D.S.C. June 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [340] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Robinson v. Clark, 543 F. App'x 339 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

543 F. App'x 339 (Robinson v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related