Robinson v. City of South Euclid

Ohio Supreme Court

Robinson v. City of South Euclid

67 N.E.2d 327, 146 Ohio St. 627, 146 Ohio St. (N.S.) 627, 33 Ohio Op. 96, 1946 Ohio LEXIS 359

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 29, 1946

Docket30518

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 67 N.E.2d 327 (Robinson v. City of South Euclid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. City of South Euclid, 67 N.E.2d 327, 146 Ohio St. 627, 146 Ohio St. (N.S.) 627, 33 Ohio Op. 96, 1946 Ohio LEXIS 359 (Ohio 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Counsel for appellant contend that, under Section 11571, General Code, a bill of exceptions is not necessary in a case in which the entry of judgment shows that the case was tried on an agreed statement of facts which was filed with the papers in the case.

The journal entry of the Court of Appeals in the instant case recites that the cause was “heard on the pleadings, evidence and stipulation of fact.” (Emphasis supplied.) Section 11571, General Code, does not apply to a case which was heard on the evidence and an agreed statement or stipulation of facts.

There being no bill of exceptions in the instant case, the record is insufficient for review and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is therefore affirmed. Townsend v. Harrison, 58 Ohio St., 398, 50 N. E., 985; Tenesy v. City of Cleveland, 133 Ohio St., 251, 13 N. E. (2d), 122.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI