Robinson v. City of Poughkeepsie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robinson v. City of Poughkeepsie

112 A.D.2d 435

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 29, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.2d 435 (Robinson v. City of Poughkeepsie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. City of Poughkeepsie, 112 A.D.2d 435 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to enlarge the record previously submitted in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent City Manager of the City of Poughkeepsie, dated June 13, 1983, which, upon adopting the findings and recommendation of a hearing officer, found petitioner guilty of certain charges, and terminated his employment as a bus driver, which proceeding was determined by order of this court dated August 6, 1984 (Matter of Robinson v City of Poughkeepsie, 104 AD2d 370), and thereupon for reargument of said proceeding.

Motion granted to the extent of enlarging the record to include the material inadvertently omitted from the printed record previously submitted and granting reargument. Upon reargument, the court adheres to its previous determination. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to enlarge the record previously submitted in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent City Manager of the City of Poughkeepsie, dated June 13, 1983, which, upon adopting the findings and recommendation of a hearing officer, found petitioner guilty of certain charges, and terminated his employment as a bus driver, which proceeding was determined by order of this court dated August 6, 1984 (Matter of Robinson v City of Poughkeepsie, 104 AD2d 370), and thereupon for reargument of said proceeding.

Motion granted to the extent of enlarging the record to include the material inadvertently omitted from the printed record previously submitted and granting reargument. Upon reargument, the court adheres to its previous determination. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-city-of-poughkeepsie-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack